
Individual differences in rat sensitivity to CO2
Author(s) -
Lucía Améndola,
Anna Ratuski,
Daniel M. Weary
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0245347
Subject(s) - risk aversion (psychology) , psychology , promotion (chess) , feeling , anxiety , personality , regulatory focus theory , developmental psychology , variation (astronomy) , social psychology , mathematics , statistics , expected utility hypothesis , physics , psychiatry , politics , creativity , political science , astrophysics , law
Feelings of fear, anxiety, dyspnea and panic when inhaling carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) are variable among humans, in part due to differences in CO 2 sensitivity. Rat aversion to CO 2 consistently varies between individuals; this variation in aversion may reflect CO 2 sensitivity, but other personality traits could also account for individual differences in aversion. The aims of this study were to 1) assess the stability of individual differences in rat aversion to CO 2 , 2) determine if individual differences in sweet reward motivation are associated with variation in aversion to CO 2 , and 3) assess whether variation in aversion to CO 2 is related to individual differences in motivation to approach gains (promotion focus) or maintain safety (prevention focus). Twelve female Sprague Dawley rats were exposed multiple times at three different ages (3, 9 and 16 months old) to CO 2 in approach-avoidance testing to assess motivation to avoid CO 2 against motivation to gain sweet rewards. Rats were also tested for motivation to find hidden sweet rewards, and for their motivation to approach rewards or darkness. Tolerance to CO 2 increased with repeated exposures and was higher at older ages. Individual differences in aversion to CO 2 were highly repeatable but unrelated to motivation for sweet rewards or the strength of promotion and prevention focus. These results indicate that individual differences in aversion to CO 2 reflect variation in CO 2 sensitivity.