z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire
Author(s) -
Timo Lorenz,
Kathrin Heinitz,
Clemens Beer,
Marianne van Woerkom
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0245127
Subject(s) - adaptation (eye) , german , psychology , medicine , geography , neuroscience , archaeology
The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use , perceived organizational support for deficit correction , strengths use behavior , and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples ( N 1 = 302; N 2 = 243, N 3 = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies ( CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here