Open AccessImplementation of the new integrated algorithm for diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Karnataka State, India: How well are we doing?
Author(s) -
Steven G. Smith,
Ajay Kumar,
Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy,
Divya Nair,
Reena Kingsbury,
R. Padmesha,
Magesh Velu,
P Suganthi,
J. Gupta,
Javed Ahmed,
G. Puttaswamy,
Somashekarayya Hiremath,
Ravi Kumar,
Rony Jose Kokkad,
Somashekar Narasimhaiah
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0244785
Subject(s) - tuberculosis , rifampicin , medicine , algorithm , multi drug resistant tuberculosis , mycobacterium tuberculosis , cohort , drug resistant tuberculosis , drug resistance , pathology , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , mathematics
Background As per national policy, all diagnosed tuberculosis patients in India are to be tested using Xpert ® MTB/RIF assay at the district level to diagnose rifampicin resistance. Regardless of the result, samples are transported to the reference laboratories for further testing: first-line Line Probe Assay (FL-LPA) for rifampicin-sensitive samples and second-line LPA(SL-LPA) for rifampicin-resistant samples. Based on the results, samples undergo culture and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. We assessed among patients diagnosed with tuberculosis at 13 selected Xpert laboratories of Karnataka state, India, i) the proportion whose samples reached the reference laboratories and among them, proportion who completed the diagnostic algorithm ii) factors associated with non-reaching and non-completion and iii) the delays involved. Methods This was a cohort study involving review of programme records. For each TB patient diagnosed between 1 st July and 31 st August 2018 at the Xpert laboratory, we tracked the laboratory register at the linked reference laboratory until 30 th September (censor date) using Nikshay ID (a unique patient identifier), phone number, name, age and sex. Results Of 1660 TB patients, 1208(73%) samples reached the reference laboratories and among those reached, 1124(93%) completed the algorithm. Of 1590 rifampicin-sensitive samples, 1170(74%) reached and 1104(94%) completed the algorithm. Of 64 rifampicin-resistant samples, only 35(55%) reached and 17(49%) completed the algorithm. Samples from rifampicin-resistant TB, extra-pulmonary TB and two districts were less likely to reach the reference laboratory. Non-completion was more likely among rifampicin-resistant TB and sputum-negative samples. The median time for conducting and reporting results of Xpert® MTB/RIF was one day, of FL-LPA 5 days and of SL-LPA16 days. Conclusion These findings are encouraging given the complexity of the algorithm. High non-reaching and non-completion rates in rifampicin-resistant patients is a major concern. Future research should focus on understanding the reasons for the gaps identified using qualitative research methods.