
Pre-existing minor variants with NS5A L31M/V-Y93H double substitution are closely linked to virologic failure with asunaprevir plus daclatasvir treatment for genotype 1b hepatitis C virus infection
Author(s) -
Naoki Morishita,
Ryotaro Sakamori,
Tomomi Yamada,
Yugo Kai,
Yuki Tahata,
Atsushi Urabe,
Ryotaro Yamada,
Tatsuhiko Kodama,
Hayato Hikita,
Yoshinori Doi,
Shinji Tamura,
Hideki Hagiwara,
Yumiko Imai,
Sadaharu Iio,
Tomohide Tatsumi,
Tetsuo Takehara
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0234811
Subject(s) - ns5a , daclatasvir , deep sequencing , virology , amino acid substitution , genotype , biology , hepatitis c virus , virus , hepacivirus , genetics , gene , mutation , ribavirin , genome
Background L31 and Y93 in the NS5A region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most important substitution positions associated with resistance to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment. Methods We analyzed the frequency of NS5A L31M/V and Y93/H in NS5A inhibitor-naive HCV genotype 1 patients who received asunaprevir plus daclatasvir combination treatment using a conventional sequencing method and a deep sequencing method that can distinguish a single substitution at either position and a double substitution at both positions with a 0.1% detection threshold. Results The frequency of substitutions at both sites using the conventional method was very low, with 1 in 14 non-responders and 0 in 42 randomly selected responder patients. On the other hand, for the deep sequencing method, cases with double substitutions in the tandem sequence were detected in 8/14 non-responders and 1/42 responders (p<0.0001). For the conventional method, substitutions were detected at any position in 6/14 non-responders and 2/42 responders (p = 0.0019), with a clear difference between the two groups. The difference was also clear with the deep sequencing method, with 11/14 non-responders and 8/42 responders. Interestingly, for the deep sequencing method, the single substitution of L31 was found in 6/14 non-responders and 7/42 responders, whereas single substitutions of Y93 or double substitutions were found in 7/14 vs. 1/42 and 8/14 vs. 1/42 patients, respectively. Conclusions NS5A L31 and Y93 substitutions were detected in tandem by the deep sequencing methods in several genotype 1 patients, who may be more resistant to DAA treatment containing an NS5A inhibitor.