z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Multiple measures derived from 3D photonic body scans improve predictions of fat and muscle mass in young Swiss men
Author(s) -
Roman Sager,
Sabine Güsewell,
Frank J Rühli,
Nicole Bender,
Kaspar Staub
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0234552
Subject(s) - bioelectrical impedance analysis , waist , circumference , anthropometry , population , body mass index , body fat percentage , standard deviation , medicine , fat mass , mathematics , statistics , geometry , environmental health
Digital tools like 3D laser-based photonic scanners, which can assess external anthropometric measurements for population based studies, and predict body composition, are gaining in importance. Here we focus on a) systematic deviation between manually determined and scanned standard measurements, b) differences regarding the strength of association between these standard measurements and body composition, and c) improving these predictions of body composition by considering additional scan measurements. Methods We analysed 104 men aged 19–23. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis was used to estimate whole body fat mass, visceral fat mass and skeletal muscle mass (SMM). For the 3D body scans, an Anthroscan VITUSbodyscan was used to automatically obtain 90 body shape measurements. Manual anthropometric measurements (height, weight, waist circumference) were also taken. Results Scanned and manually measured height, waist circumference, waist-to-height-ratio, and BMI were strongly correlated (Spearman Rho>0.96), however we also found systematic differences. When these variables were used to predict body fat or muscle mass, explained variation and prediction standard errors were similar between scanned and manual measurements. The univariable predictions performed well for both visceral fat (r 2 up to 0.92) and absolute fat mass (AFM, r 2 up to 0.87) but not for SMM (r 2 up to 0.54). Of the 90 body scanner measures used in the multivariable prediction models, belly circumference and middle hip circumference were the most important predictors of body fat content. Stepwise forward model selection using the AIC criterion showed that the best predictive power (r 2 up to 0.99) was achieved with models including 49 scanner measurements. Conclusion The use of a 3D full body scanner produced results that strongly correlate to manually measured anthropometric measures. Predictions were improved substantially by including multiple measurements, which can only be obtained with a 3D body scanner, in the models.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here