Testing the Interpersonal-Behavior model to explain intentions to use patient-delivered partner therapy
Author(s) -
Steven A. John,
Jennifer L. Walsh,
Katherine Quinn,
Young Ik Cho,
Lance S. Weinhardt
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0233348
Subject(s) - structural equation modeling , thematic analysis , interpersonal communication , social cognitive theory , social skills , social support , psychology , clinical psychology , theory of planned behavior , medicine , social psychology , developmental psychology , qualitative research , social science , statistics , mathematics , control (management) , management , sociology , economics
Background Patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) is an evidence-based method of partner treatment, but further research was needed to understand theoretical underpinnings of potential PDPT use. Purpose We sought to develop and test a theoretical framework to understand PDPT intentions. Methods A Midwestern sample of sexually transmitted infection clinic patients were recruited to participate in a three-phase study incorporating semi-structured interviews ( n = 20, total), cognitive interviews ( n = 5), and surveys ( n = 197; M age = 31.3, 61% male, 91% Black or African-American). Thematic analysis was conducted to identify major themes, which guided development and testing of a theoretical framework on PDPT intentions using structural equation modeling. Results We identified themes of information (knowledge); motivation (individual and partner protection beliefs, partner and provider motivation-to-comply); social support (sexual health and general); and behavioral skills (partner notification, medication delivery, and communication skills self-efficacy) in thematic analysis. The developed Interpersonal-Behavior model demonstrated good model fit in structural equation modeling [χ2(36) = 95.56, p <0.01; RMSEA = 0.09 (0.07–0.11, 90%C.I.); CFI = 0.94; SRMR = 0.05]. Information was associated with motivation ( β = 0.37, p <0.001) and social support ( β = 0.23, p = 0.002). Motivation was associated with social support ( β = 0.64, p <0.001) and behavioral skills ( β = 0.40, p <0.001), and social support was associated with behavioral skills ( β = 0.23, p = 0.025). Behavioral skills were associated with higher PDPT intentions ( β = 0.31, p <0.001), partially mediated the association of motivation with intentions ( β direct = 0.53, p <0.001; β indirect = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.03–0.30), and fully mediated the association of social support with intentions ( β indirect = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.00–0.21). Conclusions The Interpersonal-Behavior model seems appropriate for PDPT intentions but should be tested longitudinally with PDPT outcomes and other interpersonal health behaviors.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom