Open Access
Ototopical drops containing a novel antibacterial synthetic peptide: Safety and efficacy in adults with chronic suppurative otitis media
Author(s) -
Nanno F. A. W. Peek,
Marja J. Nell,
Ronald Brand,
Thekla M. Jansen-Werkhoven,
Ewoud J. van Hoogdalem,
R. Verrijk,
Marcel J. Vonk,
Amon R. Wafelman,
A. Rob P. M. Valentijn,
Johan H. M. Frijns,
Pieter S. Hiemstra,
Jan W. Drijfhout,
Peter H. Nibbering,
J. J. Grote
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0231573
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , chronic suppurative otitis media , adverse effect , tolerability , randomized controlled trial , otitis , antibiotics , dermatology , surgery , microbiology and biotechnology , pathology , alternative medicine , biology
Objective Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a chronic infectious disease with worldwide prevalence that causes hearing loss and decreased quality of life. As current (antibiotic) treatments often unsuccessful and antibiotic resistance is emerging, alternative agents and/or strategies are urgently needed. We considered the synthetic antimicrobial and anti-biofilm peptide P60.4Ac to be an interesting candidate because it also displays anti-inflammatory activities including lipopolysaccharide-neutralizing activity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of ototopical drops containing P60.4Ac in adults with CSOM without cholesteatoma. Methods We conducted a range-finding study in 16 subjects followed by a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase II a study in 34 subjects. P60.4Ac-containing ototopical drops or placebo drops were applied twice a day for 2 weeks and adverse events (AEs) and medication use were recorded. Laboratory tests, swabs from the middle ear and throat for bacterial cultures, and audiometry were performed at intervals up to 10 weeks after therapy. Response to treatment was assessed by blinded symptom scoring on otoscopy. Results Application of P60.4Ac-containing ototopical drops (0.25–2.0 mg of peptide/ml) in the ear canal of patients suffering from CSOM was found to be safe and well-tolerated. The optimal dose (0.5 mg of peptide/ml) was selected for the subsequent phase II a study. Safety evaluation revealed only a few AEs that were unlikely related to study treatment and all, except one, were of mild to moderate intensity. In addition to this excellent safety profile, P60.4Ac ototopical drops resulted in a treatment success in 47% of cases versus 6% in the placebo group. Conclusion The efficacy/safety balance assessed in the present study provides a compelling justification for continued clinical development of P60.4Ac in therapy-resistant CSOM.