z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma peripapillary and macular choroidal area using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography
Author(s) -
Hirokazu Kojima,
Kazuyuki Hirooka,
Eri Nitta,
Shozo Sonoda,
Taiji Sakamoto,
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0231214
Subject(s) - ophthalmology , choroid , optical coherence tomography , medicine , glaucoma , open angle glaucoma , univariate analysis , multivariate analysis , retina , optics , physics
Purpose The current study investigated differences in the peripapillary and macular choroidal areas between patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and healthy controls because the choroid may potentially play a role in glaucoma pathophysiology. Methods We assessed 57 healthy controls and 42 POAG patients in a cross-sectional comparative study. We used enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) and then converted the luminal and interstitial areas to binary images using the Niblack method to obtain peripapillary and macular choroidal images. The relationship between the choroidal area and demographic and ocular characteristics were determined with univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis. Results Regarding the peripapillary choroidal area, no significant differences were noted between healthy controls and POAG patients (1,836,336 ± 605,617 μm 2 vs. 1,775,566 ± 477,317 μm 2 , respectively, P = 0.60). There were also no differences found for the macular choroidal area (controls: 347,220 ± 115,409 μm 2 , patients: 342,193 ± 104,356 μm 2 , P = 0.83). Multivariate regression analysis in the POAG patients revealed there was a significant relationship between the macular choroidal area and age (β = −0.525, P = 0.002) and axial length (β = −0.458, P = 0.005). In contrast, no correlation was found between peripapillary choroidal areas and various attributes in the POAG patients. Conclusions EDI-OCT showed no differences in the peripapillary or macular choroidal area in healthy individuals compared to POAG patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here