Open AccessPreventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study
Author(s) -
Albertine M. B. van der Does,
E. Kneepkens,
Elien B Uitvlugt,
Sanne L. Jansen,
Louise Schilder,
George Tokmaji,
Sofieke C. Wijers,
Marijn Radersma,
Jeanne Heijnen,
Paul F. Teunissen,
Pim B. J. E. Hulshof,
Geke M. Overvliet,
C. E. H. Siegert,
Fatma Karapinar-Çarkıt
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0229940
Subject(s) - medicine , multidisciplinary approach , logistic regression , cross sectional study , emergency medicine , hospital readmission , single center , medical emergency , pediatrics , family medicine , social science , pathology , sociology
Objectives To identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients’ perspectives. Design A prospective cross-sectional single-center study. Setting Urban teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Participants 430 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, discharged from one of seven participating clinical departments and an unplanned readmission within 30 days. Methods Residents from the participating departments individually assessed whether the readmission was caused by healthcare, the preventability and possible causes of readmissions using a tool. Thereafter, the preventability of the cases was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with residents of all participating departments and clinical pharmacists. The primary outcome was the proportion of readmissions that were potentially preventable. Secondary outcomes were the determinants for a readmission, causes for preventable readmissions, the change in the final decision on preventability after the multidisciplinary meeting and the value of patient interviews in assessing preventability. Differences in characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and non-PPRs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 430 readmissions, 56 (13%) were assessed as PPRs. Age was significantly associated with a PPR (adjusted OR: 2.42; 95%, CI 1.23–4.74; p = 0.01). The main causes for PPRs were diagnostic (30%), medication (27%) and management problems (27%). During the multidisciplinary meeting, the final decision on preventability changed in 11% of the cases. When a patient interview was available, it was used as a source of information to assess preventability in 26% of readmissions. In 7% of cases, the patient interview was mentioned as the most important source. Conclusion and implications 13% of readmissions were potentially preventable with diagnostic, medication or management problems being main causes. A multidisciplinary review approach and including the patient’s perspective could contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of readmissions and possible improvements.