z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using electronic health record system triggers to target delivery of a patient-centered intervention to improve venous thromboembolism prevention for hospitalized patients: Is there a differential effect by race?
Author(s) -
Oluwafemi P. Owodunni,
Elliott R. Haut,
Dauryne L. Shaffer,
Deborah B. Hobson,
Jiangxia Wang,
Gayane Yenokyan,
Peggy S. Kraus,
Jonathan Aboagye,
Katherine L. Florecki,
Kristen Webster,
Christine G. Holzmueller,
Michael B. Streiff,
Brandyn Lau
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0227339
Subject(s) - medicine , psychological intervention , odds ratio , intervention (counseling) , patient safety , emergency medicine , health care , odds , nursing , logistic regression , economics , economic growth
Background Racial disparities are common in healthcare. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable harm, and disparities observed in prevention practices. We examined the impact of a patient-centered VTE education bundle on the non-administration of preventive prophylaxis by race. Methods A post-hoc, subset analysis (stratified by race) of a larger nonrandomized trial. Pre-post comparisons analysis were conducted on 16 inpatient units; study periods were October 2014 through March 2015 (baseline) and April through December 2015 (post-intervention). Patients on 4 intervention units received the patient-centered, nurse educator-led intervention if the electronic health record alerted a non-administered dose of VTE prophylaxis. Patients on 12 control units received no intervention. We compared the conditional odds of non-administered doses of VTE prophylaxis when patient refusal was a reason for non-administration, stratified by race. Results Of 272 patient interventions, 123 (45.2%) were white, 126 (46.3%) were black, and 23 (8.5%) were other races. A significant reduction was observed in the odds of non-administration of prophylaxis on intervention units compared to control units among patients who were black (OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46–0.81, p <0.001), white (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44–0.75, p <0.001), and other races (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29–0.88, p = 0.015). Conclusion Our finding suggests that the patient education materials, developed collaboratively with a diverse group of patients, improved patient’s understanding and the importance of VTE prevention through prophylaxis. Quality improvement interventions should examine any differential effects by patient characteristics to ensure disparities are addressed and all patients experience the same benefits.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here