z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Hypertension prevalence but not control varies across the spectrum of risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: A RE-LY atrial fibrillation registry sub-study
Author(s) -
Finlay A. McAlister,
Rajibul Mian,
Jonas Oldgren,
Lars Wallentin,
Michael D. Ezekowitz,
Salim Yusuf,
Stuart J. Connolly,
Jeff S. Healey
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0226259
Subject(s) - atrial fibrillation , medicine , cardiology , case control study
Background Although hypertension is the most common risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), whether blood pressure (BP) control varies across the spectrum of stroke risk in patients with AF or by adequacy of their thromboprophylaxis management is unclear. Methods We examined data from the RE-LY AF registry conducted at 164 emergency departments (EDs) in 47 countries between December 2007 and October 2011. Results Of the 15,400 patients in the registry, we analyzed the 9929 (mean age 67.5 years, 51.9% men) with a prior history of AF and complete BP data. While 6508 (66.5%) AF patients had hypertension, the prevalence varied widely depending on comorbidity profiles: from 45.4% in those without other cardiovascular risk factors to 82.5% in those with AF and diabetes. Although 93.9% of AF patients with hypertension were on at least one antihypertensive agent, fewer than half had BP levels ≤ 140/90 with no difference across risk profiles: 45.9% of those with NVAF and CHADS 2 scores of 1 and 45.6% of those with NVAF and CHADS 2 scores of 2 or more (46.9% and 45.3% for CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores of 1 versus 2 or more). BP control rates were not significantly better in those NVAF patients receiving guideline concordant thromboprophylaxis management (47.2%, aOR 1.03, 95%CI 0.89–1.20) than in those not receiving guideline-concordant antithrombotic therapy (45.3%). Conclusions Hypertension was common in patients with AF but BP control rates were sub-optimal and varied little across the spectrum of stroke risk or by adequacy of thromboprophylaxis. This highlights the need for an increased focus on total atherosclerotic risk rather than just thromboprophylaxis management in AF patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here