z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Financial risk protection at the bedside: How Ethiopian physicians try to minimize out-of-pocket health expenditures
Author(s) -
Ingrid Miljeteig,
Frehiwot Berhane Defaye,
Paul Wakim,
Dawit Desalegn,
Yemane Berhane,
Ole Frithjof Norheim,
Marion Danis
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0212129
Subject(s) - medicine , poverty , limiting , health care , public health , medical prescription , descriptive statistics , welfare , intervention (counseling) , finance , family medicine , environmental health , business , nursing , economic growth , economics , mechanical engineering , market economy , statistics , mathematics , engineering
Background Out-of-pocket health expenditures can pose major financial risks, create access-barriers and drive patients and families into poverty. Little is known about physicians’ role in financial protection of patients and families at the bedside in low-income settings and how they perceive their roles and duties when treating patients in a health care system requiring high out-of-pocket costs. Objective Assess physicians’ concerns regarding financial welfare of patients and their families and analyze physicians’ experiences in reducing catastrophic health expenditures for patients in Ethiopia. Method A national survey was conducted among physicians at 49 public hospitals in six regions in Ethiopia. Descriptive statistics were used. Results Totally 587 physicians responded (response rate 91%) and 565 filled the inclusion criteria. Health care costs driving people into financial crisis and poverty were witnessed by 82% of respondants, and 88% reported that costs for the patient are important when deciding to use or not use an intervention. Several strategies to save costs for patients were used: 37–79% of physicians were doing this daily or weekly through limiting prescription of drugs, limiting radiologic studies, ultrasound and lab tests, providing second best treatments, and avoiding admission or initiating early discharge. Overall, 75% of the physicians reported that ongoing and future costs to patients influenced their decisions to a greater extent than concerns for preserving hospital resources. Conclusion In Ethiopia, a low-income country aiming to move towards universal health coverage, physicians view themselves as both stewards of public resources, patient advocates and financial protectors of patients and their families. Their high concern for family welfare should be acknowledged and the economic and ethical implications of this practice must be further explored.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here