Open AccessFirst evaluation of the Next-Generation Sequencing platform for the detection of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations in Belgium
Author(s) -
Géraldine Dessilly,
Léonie Goeminne,
Anne-Thérèse Vandenbroucke,
François E. Dufrasne,
Anandi Martin,
Benoît Kabamba-Mukabi
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0209561
Subject(s) - drug resistance , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , dna sequencing , hiv drug resistance , mutation , drug , computational biology , biology , genetics , resistance mutation , virology , dna , polymerase chain reaction , reverse transcriptase , antiretroviral therapy , gene , viral load , pharmacology
The WHO urges action against the threat posed by HIV drug resistance. It is well known that the sensitivity of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is greater than that of Sanger Sequencing (SS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the novel NGS HIV-1 drug resistance monitoring system. Materials & methods NGS analyses were performed on 67 plasma samples from HIV-1 infected patients using the Sentosa SQ HIV Genotyping Assay from Vela-Dx. This kit was used on a semi-automated Ion Torrent-based platform. Sequences were compared to those obtained by SS. Samples were analysed in the same and in separate runs. Quality controls (QC) were added to control sequencing processes of protease (PRO), reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase (INT) regions. Results Of the 41 analysed samples, 33 (80.5%) had identical drug resistance interpretation reports. Discrepant results were observed for eight samples. Five of them were only detected by NGS and had drug resistance mutations (DRMs) with an allelic frequency below the limit of detection of the SS method (between 6.3 to 20.5%). Two DRMs were only identified using the SS method. The sequences were similar in 98.2% of cases (counting variants as mismatches) and homologous in 99.9% if missed variants. Duplicated samples in a single run were similar in 95.7% (99.9%) of cases. Duplicated samples in two different runs were 98% (100%) homologous. QC results were manually assessed with a score of 340/340 for detection of DRMs in PRO and RT and 100% for INT sequencing. Conclusions This is the first preliminary evaluation in Belgium employing the Sentosa SQ HIV Genotyping Assay. The NGS appears to be a promising tool for the detection of DRMs in HIV-1 patients and showed a higher sensitivity compared to SS. Large studies assessing the clinical relevance of low frequency DRMs are needed.