Open AccessImportance of neuropsychological screening in physicians referred for performance concerns
Author(s) -
Brenda Williams,
Philip Flanders,
Dillon Welindt,
Michael Williams
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207874
Subject(s) - neurocognitive , normative , sample (material) , medicine , neuropsychology , variance (accounting) , interpersonal communication , family medicine , psychology , clinical psychology , cognition , psychiatry , social psychology , philosophy , chemistry , accounting , epistemology , chromatography , business
The literature suggests that 6–12% of practicing physicians are dyscompetent. Dyscompetence can manifest as failures in direct provision of care, but also issues with interpersonal and communications skills and professionalism. There is a growing literature suggesting the value of neurocognitive screening in physicians with clinical competency issues. The contribution of such screening in physicians with workplace behavioral issues is not as established. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine patterns of performance on a commonly used neuropsychological screening instrument. Performances differences, if present, could have implications for remediation and/or monitoring. Methods Published data on a computerized neurocognitive screening instrument (MicroCog) for normative physician samples, published data on physicians referred for clinical competency issues, and newly collected data on physicians with workplace behavioral issues were analyzed. A two-way analysis of variance (Sample X Index) and post-hoc paired comparisons were conducted. A second analysis was performed employing an aggregated estimate of normative physician performance. Results Results revealed a significant main effect for Sample and Index and a significant interaction effect. The second analysis of variance employing the pooled samples (Sample X Index) was conducted. The workplace behavior issues sample differed significantly from each of the samples. The Sample by Index interaction was significant. Discussion Significant differences in performance on a neurocognitive screening instrument were found between non-referred physicians and physicians with behavioral or medical/technical competency concerns. Those with workplace behavioral issues performed significantly better than those with medical/technical issues, but significantly worse than non-referred physicians. Using these findings, 2.0% of the normal sample versus 35.1% of the medical/technical sample, and 10.9% of the behavioral sample would fail the screen using typical, conservative cutoffs. Further study of the potential role of neurocognitive factors in physicians referred for behavioral comportment issues is warranted.