Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Taiwan version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen
Author(s) -
Meng-Ta Lee,
Wan-Ying Chang,
Yuh Jang
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207851
Subject(s) - montreal cognitive assessment , dementia , intraclass correlation , cronbach's alpha , receiver operating characteristic , inter rater reliability , cognition , cognitive impairment , mini–mental state examination , psychology , medicine , reliability (semiconductor) , audiology , psychometrics , clinical psychology , gerontology , psychiatry , developmental psychology , disease , rating scale , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics
There is a need for a screening tool with capacities of accurate detection of early mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia and is suitable for use in a range of languages and cultural contexts. This research aims to evaluate the psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Taiwan version of Q mci (Q mci -TW) screen and to explore the discriminating ability of the Q mci -TW in differentiating among normal controls (NCs), MCI and dementia. Thirty-one participants with dementia and 36 with MCI and 35 NCs were recruited from a neurology department of regional hospital in Taiwan. Their results on the Q mci -TW, Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Traditional Chinese version of the Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE) were compared. For analysis, we used Cronbach’s α , intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman’s ρ , Kruskal–Wallis test, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and multivariate analysis, as appropriate. The Q mci -TW exhibited satisfactory test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and interrater reliability as well as a strong positive correlation with results from the MoCA and MMSE. The optimal cut-off score on the Q mci -TW for differentiating MCI from NC was ≤ 51.5/100 and dementia from MCI was ≤ 31/100. The MoCA exhibited the highest accuracy in differentiating MCI from NC, followed by the Q mci -TW and then MMSE; whereas, the Q mci -TW and MMSE exhibited the same accuracy in differentiating dementia from MCI, followed by the MoCA. The Q mci -TW may be a useful clinical screening tool for a spectrum of cognitive impairments.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom