Open AccessPsychometric and diagnostic properties of the Taiwan version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen
Author(s) -
Meng-Ta Lee,
Wan-Ying Chang,
Yuh Jang
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207851
Subject(s) - montreal cognitive assessment , dementia , intraclass correlation , cronbach's alpha , receiver operating characteristic , inter rater reliability , cognition , cognitive impairment , mini–mental state examination , psychology , medicine , reliability (semiconductor) , audiology , psychometrics , clinical psychology , gerontology , psychiatry , developmental psychology , disease , rating scale , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics
There is a need for a screening tool with capacities of accurate detection of early mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia and is suitable for use in a range of languages and cultural contexts. This research aims to evaluate the psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Taiwan version of Q mci (Q mci -TW) screen and to explore the discriminating ability of the Q mci -TW in differentiating among normal controls (NCs), MCI and dementia. Thirty-one participants with dementia and 36 with MCI and 35 NCs were recruited from a neurology department of regional hospital in Taiwan. Their results on the Q mci -TW, Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Traditional Chinese version of the Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE) were compared. For analysis, we used Cronbach’s α , intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman’s ρ , Kruskal–Wallis test, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and multivariate analysis, as appropriate. The Q mci -TW exhibited satisfactory test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and interrater reliability as well as a strong positive correlation with results from the MoCA and MMSE. The optimal cut-off score on the Q mci -TW for differentiating MCI from NC was ≤ 51.5/100 and dementia from MCI was ≤ 31/100. The MoCA exhibited the highest accuracy in differentiating MCI from NC, followed by the Q mci -TW and then MMSE; whereas, the Q mci -TW and MMSE exhibited the same accuracy in differentiating dementia from MCI, followed by the MoCA. The Q mci -TW may be a useful clinical screening tool for a spectrum of cognitive impairments.