z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Determining minimal output sets that ensure structural identifiability
Author(s) -
Dominique Joubert,
J.D. Stigter,
Jaap Molenaar
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207334
Subject(s) - identifiability , computer science , flexibility (engineering) , measure (data warehouse) , process (computing) , task (project management) , algorithm , set (abstract data type) , experimental data , data mining , mathematical optimization , mathematics , machine learning , statistics , management , economics , programming language , operating system
The process of inferring parameter values from experimental data can be a cumbersome task. In addition, the collection of experimental data can be time consuming and costly. This paper covers both these issues by addressing the following question: “Which experimental outputs should be measured to ensure that unique model parameters can be calculated?”. Stated formally, we examine the topic of minimal output sets that guarantee a model’s structural identifiability. To that end, we introduce an algorithm that guides a researcher as to which model outputs to measure. Our algorithm consists of an iterative structural identifiability analysis and can determine multiple minimal output sets of a model. This choice in different output sets offers researchers flexibility during experimental design. Our method can determine minimal output sets of large differential equation models within short computational times.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here