Open AccessNew insertion method of transnasal ileus tube for small bowel obstruction: Anterior balloon method
Author(s) -
Daisuke Yamaguchi,
Kei Ikeda,
Yuki Takeuchi,
Rikako Kinoshita,
Toru Higuchi,
Hiroko Fukuda,
Naoyuki Tominaga,
Tomohito Morisaki,
Keisuke Ario,
Seiji Tsunada,
Haruhiko Yoshida,
Kazuma Fujimoto
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207099
Subject(s) - bowel obstruction , ileus , medicine , balloon , tube (container) , surgery , materials science , composite material
Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is usually caused by postoperative adhesions and malignant disease, and decompression is effective for SBO. Our previous case report suggested that a new transnasal ileus tube insertion method, the anterior balloon method (ABM), could achieve decompression for adhesive SBO. Aims The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a new method for inserting transnasal ileus tubes in patients with SBO. Methods Altogether, 134 patients with small bowel obstruction treated from January 2011 to December 2017 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into two groups: those with the new method that inserts an anterior balloon (ABM group: 52 patients, 2014–2017) versus those with the ordinary insertion method (OIM group: 82 patients, 2011–2014). Results The patients’ characteristics and symptoms on admission were similar in the ABM and OIM groups. Adhesions were the main cause of ileus in the two groups. The insertion time duration was significantly shorter in the ABM group than in OIM group (28.4 ± 9.1 vs. 33.5 ± 13.0 min; p = 0.01). The ABM group also had significantly longer tubes than OIM group (222.4 ± 32.2 vs. 157.4 ± 31.7 cm; p < 0.001), which resulted in a significantly shorter time until clinical symptoms were relieved in ABM group. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions The ABM group had shorter insertion duration and longer tubes than those of OIM group. The ABM might become a preferred therapeutic choice to achieve decompression in patients with SBO.