z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of six decontamination procedures for isolation of Mycobacterium avium complex from avian feces
Author(s) -
Abdul Sattar,
Zunita Zakaria,
Jalila Abu,
Saleha Abdul Aziz,
Gabriel Rojas-Ponce
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0202034
Subject(s) - microbiology and biotechnology , human decontamination , feces , mycobacterium , isolation (microbiology) , nontuberculous mycobacteria , paratuberculosis , chemistry , biology , chromatography , bacteria , medicine , genetics , pathology
Culture is considered the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. However, consensus about the most suitable culture procedure for isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria is lacking. The study compared the recoveries of mycobacteria after decontamination of spiked and fresh avian feces with 4% sodium hydroxide (NaOH), 12% sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), or 1% cetylperidinium chloride (CPC), with and without mixture of three antibiotics, namely vancomycin (VAN, 100 μg/ml), nalidixic acid (NAL, 100 μg/ml), and amphotericin B (AMB, 100 μg/ml). The antibiotic mixture was referred to as VNA. Decontamination procedures were evaluated using two ( n = 2) avian fecal samples spiked with 10 6 , 10 4 , and 10 2 CFU/ml of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium (ATCC 15769) and fresh avian feces ( n = 42). M . avium subsp. avium was detected on the culture media from spiked samples (10 6 and 10 4 CFU/ml) decontaminated with NaOH, NaOH-VNA, H 2 SO 4 , and H 2 SO 4 -VNA for 2−6 weeks. These bacteria were detected in 2–4 weeks when using CPC and CPC-VNA. M . avium subsp. avium cannot be isolated on culture media from spiked samples (10 2 CFU/ml) decontaminated with any decontaminating agent. Two mycobacterial isolates, namely, Mycobacterium terrae and M . engbaekii , were isolated from field samples decontaminated with NaOH and CPC-VNA. With regard to the contamination rate, the use of CPC-VNA showed lower contamination rates (5.5% and 19.0%) from spiked and field samples than those of the other methods (NaOH: 22.2% and 59.5%, NaOH-VNA: 16.7% and 21.4%, H 2 SO 4 : 11.1% and 40.5%, H 2 SO 4 -VNA: 5.5% and 21.4%, and CPC: 66.7% and 50%). In conclusion, the decontamination of fecal samples following a two-step procedure with 1% CPC and VNA can ensure high recovery rate of many mycobacteria with the lowest contamination in cultures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom