z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Quality of pediatric anesthesia: A cross-sectional study of a university hospital in a low-income country
Author(s) -
Oskar Andersson,
Peter J. Radell,
Victor Ringo,
Moses Mulungu,
Tim Baker
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0194622
Subject(s) - cross sectional study , medicine , cross country , environmental health , family medicine , pediatrics , demographic economics , economics , pathology
Objective To evaluate the quality of pediatric anesthesia in a university hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Method A cross-sectional study conducted using a new tool that was developed from the literature and WHO recommendations including 28 parameters as standards for pediatric anesthesia. These 28 parameters consisted of 17 structure parameters of the equipment and medicines that should be present in theatre before any surgery starts, and 11 process parameters of actions taken by staff. Adverse events occurring during the anesthesia were recorded. Results 30 patients were included, aged between 1.5 months to 5 years with a mean of 2.4 years. 26 of the patients underwent elective surgery and 4 patients emergency surgery. Nine parameters were always present and one parameter (bag and mask) was not available for any of the patients. The structure index ranged from 71% to 94% with a mean of 84%. The process index had a mean score of 71% with a range from 50% to 90%: lower than the structure index (p<0.001). With the structure and process index combined the average score was 79% with a low of 67% and high of 89%. 70 adverse events were observed with a range from 0 to 7 adverse events per patient. The most common adverse event was hypoxia at extubation in 20 (69%) patients. Nine patients had an episode of severe hypoxia at extubation. Conclusion Pediatric anesthesia in low resource settings suffers from deficiencies in the structures and processes of providing good quality care. Improvement efforts may be best focused on improving the consistency and quality of the process of care and a reduction in adverse events rather than the structures available. Use of the assessment tool developed for this research could be useful for systematic quality-improvement efforts and to assess the needs in different settings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here