
Mortality and continuity of care – Definitions matter! A cohort study in diabetics
Author(s) -
Angelika Geroldinger,
Simone Katja Sauter,
Georg Heinze,
Gottfried Endel,
Wolfgang Dorda,
Georg Duftschmid
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0191386
Subject(s) - continuity of care , medicine , proportional hazards model , index (typography) , sample (material) , demography , health care , gerontology , computer science , chemistry , chromatography , sociology , world wide web , economics , economic growth
Objective To demonstrate that when investigating the relevance of continuity of care for patient outcomes, different definitions can lead to contradicting results. Methods We used claims data from the regional public health insurer of Lower Austria covering the period from 2008 to 2011. The study sample included subjects with repeated dispensings of anti-diabetic drugs. The continuity of care index was calculated firstly based on a patient’s contacts with general practitioners (primary COCI) and secondly based on contacts at all medical disciplines (total COCI). The association of the two continuity of care measures with mortality was assessed in separate univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. Results Our study sample consisted of 51,717 patients with a median observation time of 3.65 years. The data showed that a high total COCI was associated with increased mortality, while there was no association between primary COCI and mortality. Conclusions Measures of continuity of care are highly sensitive to the type of medical disciplines taken into account. The continuity of care index calculated from contacts at all medical disciplines might measure diversity rather than continuity of care.