Open AccessSabina chinensis and Liriodendron chinense improve air quality in Beijing, China
Author(s) -
Yue Wu,
Wenmei Ma,
Jiakai Liu,
Lijuan Zhu,
Ling Cong,
Jiexiu Zhai,
Yu Wang,
Zhenming Zhang
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0189640
Subject(s) - canopy , environmental science , particulates , beijing , wind speed , daytime , vegetation (pathology) , atmospheric sciences , air quality index , ecology , china , meteorology , geography , biology , geology , medicine , archaeology , pathology
Urban forests have been shown to be efficient for reducing air pollutants especially for particulate matters (PMs). This study aims to reveal the PM blocking capacity of two common artificial landscape species, Sabina chinensis and Liriodendron chinense and to investigate spatial-temporal heterogeneities by estimating the vegetation collection velocity of coarse (PM10) and fine particles (PM2.5) during different seasons and heights. PM concentration and meteorological data were collected on both leeward and windward sides of trees during the daytime in both summers and winters from 2013 to 2015. Concentration and meteorological monitors were installed at three heights, bottom (1.5 m), middle (3.5 m), and top (5.5 m) of the canopy. The results showed: During daytime, the collection velocity changed and PM2.5 collection velocity was much higher than that of PM10. Furthermore, the maximum collection velocities of L . chinense and S . chinensis occurred at 14:00–16:00 both in summer and winter. Moreover, the collection velocity had a positive correlation with wind speed and temperature. The blocking capacities of L . chinense and S . chinensis varied from season to season, and the concentrations of particulate matter indicate the middle canopy of both species as the most effective part for TSP blocking. Furthermore, these two species are more effective blocking in PM2.5 than PM10. The blocking capacity of S . chinensis is generally better. The vegetation collection is the major process of PM removal near the ground and sedimentation was not taken into consideration near the ground.