Open AccessValidation of pathological grading systems for predicting metastatic potential in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma
Author(s) -
Jung Min Koh,
Seong Hee Ahn,
Hyeonmok Kim,
Beom Jun Kim,
Tae Yon Sung,
Young Hoon Kim,
Suck Joon Hong,
Dong Eun Song,
Seung Hun Lee
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0187398
Subject(s) - paraganglioma , sdhb , pheochromocytoma , immunohistochemistry , medicine , metastasis , pathology , grading (engineering) , gastroenterology , oncology , biology , cancer , ecology , biochemistry , germline mutation , mutation , gene
Purpose The Grading system for Adrenal Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (GAPP) was proposed for predicting the metastatic potential of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma to overcome the limitations of the Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal Scaled Score (PASS). However, to date, no study validating the GAPP has been conducted, and previous studies did not include mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase type B (SDHB) gene in the score calculation. In this retrospective cohort study, we validated the prediction ability of GAPP and assessed whether it would be improved by inclusion of the loss of SDHB immunohistochemical staining. Methods We divided the tumors into non-metastatic and metastatic groups based on the presence of synchronous or metachronous metastases. The GAPP score and PASS at the initial operation were measured. Moreover, we combined some GAPP parameters with the immunohistochemical staining of SDHB to obtain a modified GAPP (M-GAPP) score. Results Metastasis occurred in 15/72 (20.8%) patients, with a mean follow-up of 43.5 months. Loss of SDHB staining was more frequent ( P = 0.044) in the metastatic group. The GAPP score ( P = 0.006), PASS ( P = 0.003), and M-GAPP score ( P <0.001) were all higher in the metastatic group. Twelve of 40 (30.0%) moderately or poorly differentiated tumors, as defined by the GAPP score, and 12/34 (35.3%) tumors with a PASS ≥4 were metastatic. Conversely, 10/19 (52.6%) tumors with an M-GAPP score ≥3 were metastatic. The area under the curve of the M-GAPP score (0.822) was significantly higher than that of the GAPP (0.728) ( P = 0.012), but similar to that of the PASS (0.753) ( P = 0.411). The GAPP ( P = 0.032) and M-GAPP scores ( P = 0.040), but not PASS ( P = 0.200), negatively correlated with metastasis-free survival. Conclusion The GAPP was validated, and M-GAPP, a combination of some GAPP parameters and loss of SDHB staining, might be useful for the prediction of the metastatic potential of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.