z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Influence on number of top-ups after implementing patient controlled epidural analgesia: A cohort study
Author(s) -
Ganapathy van Samkar,
Henning Hermanns,
Philipp Lirk,
Markus W. Hollmann,
Markus F. Stevens
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0186225
Subject(s) - medicine , sedation , anesthesia , clinical endpoint , cohort , surgery , randomized controlled trial
Postoperative epidural analgesia often needs rate readjustment using top-ups. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is said to reduce the requirement of epidural top-ups when compared to continuous epidural analgesia (CEA). We compared CEA and PCEA in major thoracic and abdominal surgery, in a cohort study. The primary endpoint was the required number of epidural top-ups. Secondary endpoints were pain scores, side effects and workload differences. We analysed 199 patients with CEA and 187 with PCEA. Both groups had similar pain scores. The total number of top-ups was 75 in 57 patients (CEA) versus 20 top-ups in 18 patients (PCEA). ( p = 0.0001) Sedation tended to occur more frequently in patients with CEA versus PCEA, 5.5% vs 1.6% ( p = 0.05). Implementation of PCEA led to a decreased number of top-ups, fewer side-effects and decreased use of the postoperative care unit.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here