Open AccessSleep spindle detection based on non-experts: A validation study
Author(s) -
Rui Zhao,
Jinbo Sun,
Xinxin Zhang,
Huanju Wu,
Peng Liu,
Xuejuan Yang,
Qin Wei
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0177437
Subject(s) - expert system , expert opinion , sleep spindle , computer science , artificial intelligence , medicine , eye movement , intensive care medicine , non rapid eye movement sleep
Accurate and efficient detection of sleep spindles is a methodological challenge. The present study describes a method of using non-experts for manual detection of sleep spindles. We recruited five experts and 168 non-experts to manually identify spindles in stage N2 and stage N3 sleep data using a MATLAB interface. Scorers classified each spindle into definite and indefinite spindle (with weights of 1 and 0.5, respectively). First, a method of optimizing the thresholds of the expert/non-expert group consensus according to the results of experts and non-experts themselves is described. Using this method, we established expert and non-expert group standards from expert and non-expert scorers, respectively, and evaluated the performance of the non-expert group standards by compared with the expert group standard (termed EGS). The results indicated that the highest performance was the non-expert group standard when definite spindles were only considered (termed nEGS-1; F1 score = 0.78 for N2; 0.68 for N3). Second, four automatic spindle detection methods were compared with the EGS. We found that the performance of nEGS-1 versus EGS was higher than that of the four automated methods. Our results also showed positive correlation between the mean F1 score of individual expert in EGS and the F1 score of nEGS-1 versus EGS across 30 segments of stage N2 data (r = 0.61, P < 0.001). Further, we found that six and nine non-experts were needed to manually identify spindles in stages N2 and N3, respectively, while maintaining acceptable performance of nEGS-1 versus EGS (F1 score = 0.79 for N2; 0.64 for N3). In conclusion, this study establishes a detailed process for detection of sleep spindles by non-experts in a crowdsourcing scheme.