z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using CorvisST tonometry to assess glaucoma progression
Author(s) -
Masato Matsuura,
Kazunori Hirasawa,
Hiroshi Murata,
Shunsuke Nakakura,
Yoshiaki Kiuchi,
Ryo Asaoka
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0176380
Subject(s) - glaucoma , intraocular pressure , ophthalmology , akaike information criterion , medicine , visual field , open angle glaucoma , scheimpflug principle , cornea , mathematics , statistics
Purpose To investigate the utility of the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology instrument (CST) to assess the progression of visual field (VF) damage in primary open angle glaucoma patients. Method A total of 75 eyes from 111 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were investigated. All patients underwent at least nine VF measurements with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, CST measurements, axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Mean total deviation (mTD) progression rates of the eight VFs, excluding the first VF, were calculated and the association between progression rate and the other listed measurements was analyzed using linear regression, and the optimal to describe mTD progression rate was selected based on the second order bias corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) index. Results VF progression was described best in a model that included CST parameters as well as other ocular measurements. The optimal linear model to describe mTD progression rate was given by the equation: -8.9–0.068 x mean GAT + 0.68 x A1 time + 0.31 x A2 time -0.39 x A2 length– 1.26 x highest deformation amplitude. Conclusion CST measurements are useful when assessing VF progression in glaucoma patients. In particular, careful consideration should be given to patients where: (i) an eye is observed to be applanated fast in the first and second applanations, (ii) the applanated area is wide in the second applanation and (iii) the indentation is deep at the maximum deformation, since these eyes appear to be at greater risk of VF progression.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here