
Methylation analysis and HPV genotyping of self-collected cervical samples from women not responding to screening invitation and review of the literature
Author(s) -
Annarosa Del Mistro,
Helena Frayle,
Martina Rizzi,
Gianpiero Fantin,
António Ferro,
Paolo Matteo Angeletti,
Paolo Giorgi Rossi,
Emma Altobelli
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0172226
Subject(s) - genotyping , methylation , dna methylation , medicine , oncology , biology , gene , genotype , genetics , gene expression
Aim of the study To assess the feasibility of partial HPV genotyping and methylation analysis of CADM1 , MAL , and miR124-2 genes as triage tests in assaying self-collected cervical samples positive for high-risk HPV on primary screening, and to review the literature regarding host cellular gene methylation analysis of self-collected cervical samples. Material and methods Women residing in North-East Italy who had failed to respond to the invitation to participate in an organized population-based program were invited to provide a self-sample. Their stored baseline (self-collected) and follow-up (clinician-collected) cervical samples were included in the study. DNA was extracted from HPV-positive (Qiagen’s Hybrid Capture 2, HC2) samples. Partial genotyping with separate detection of HPV types 16 and 18 was performed with a hybrid capture-based method and a quantitative PCR assay. Methylation was assayed with a quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Results High-risk HPV infection was detected in 48% of baseline and 71% of follow-up HC2-positive samples. Methylation was demonstrated respectively in 15% and 23.5% of baseline and follow-up samples and chiefly involved a single gene ( miR124-2 ). Invalid quantitative PCR results were recorded in 5% of self-collected samples. The specificity of miR124-1 , MAL , and CADM1 methylation was 84%, 94%, and 98%, respectively, and the specificity of the three markers combined was 84%. Sensitivity was not estimated due to the lack of CIN2+ samples. The systematic review showed that different methylation assays yield different accuracy values. Conclusion Self-collected samples are suitable for methylation assays included in reflex triage testing. The reproducibility and accuracy of the methylation tests described in the literature should be improved.