z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The uniqueness of morphological features of pure erythroid leukemia in myeloid neoplasm with erythroid predominance: A reassessment using criteria revised in the 2016 World Health Organization classification
Author(s) -
PoShen Ko,
Yao Chung Liu,
Chiu Mei Yeh,
Jyh Pyng Gau,
Yuan Bin Yu,
Liang Tsai Hsiao,
Cheng Hwai Tzeng,
Po Min Chen,
Tzeon Jye Chiou,
Chia Jen Liu,
Jin Hwang Liu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0172029
Subject(s) - hypoalbuminemia , leukocytosis , medicine , gastroenterology , univariate analysis , anemia , confidence interval , bone marrow , myeloid leukemia , hazard ratio , myeloproliferative neoplasm , leukemia , pathology , multivariate analysis , myelofibrosis
We reviewed 97 consecutive cases of myeloid neoplasm with erythroid predominance (MN-EP) between 2000 and 2015. Following 2016 WHO classification, MN-EP patients were classified into four groups. Eight pure erythroid leukemia (PEL) (including t-MN and AML-MRC morphologically fulfilled criteria for PEL) patients had dismal outcomes (median OS: 1 month) and showed more bone marrow fibrosis, worse performance status (PS) and higher serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at diagnosis than the other groups. In the univariate analysis, risks of death in MN-EP patients included the morphologic features of PEL, very poor cytogenetic risk by IPSS-R, bone marrow fibrosis, leukocytosis, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, high LDH, and poor PS. In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of death were morphologic features of PEL (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–9.74, p = 0.018), very poor cytogenetic risk by IPSS-R (adjusted HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.22–6.10, p = 0.015), hypoalbuminemia (< 3.7 g/dl) (adjusted HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.10–4.91, p = 0.026) and high serum LDH (≥ 250 U/L) (adjusted HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.28–4.36, p = 0.006). Poor or unfavorable risk in different cytogenetic risk systems independently predicted death and UKMRC-R was the best model.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here