z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Direct Acoustic Stimulation at the Lateral Canal: An Alternative Route to the Inner Ear?
Author(s) -
Nicolas Verhaert,
Joris Walraevens,
Christian Desloovere,
Jan Wouters,
Jean-Marc Gérard
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0160819
Subject(s) - stapes , round window , materials science , footplate , fixation (population genetics) , ear canal , biomedical engineering , semicircular canal , inner ear , acoustics , laser doppler vibrometer , significant difference , anatomy , middle ear , medicine , audiology , physics , vestibular system , wavelength , population , environmental health , thermodynamics , optoelectronics , distributed feedback laser
Severe to profound mixed hearing loss is associated with hearing rehabilitation difficulties. Recently, promising results for speech understanding were obtained with a direct acoustic cochlear implant (DACI). The surgical implantation of a DACI with standard coupling through a stapedotomy can however be regarded as challenging. Therefore, in this experimental study, the feasibility of direct acoustic stimulation was investigated at an anatomically and surgically more accessible inner ear site. DACI stimulation of the intact , blue-lined and opened lateral semicircular canal (LC) was investigated and compared with standard oval window (OW) coupling. Additionally, stapes footplate fixation was induced. Round window (RW) velocity, as a measure of the performance of the device and its coupling efficiency, was determined in fresh-frozen human cadaver heads. Using single point laser Doppler vibrometry, RW velocity could reliably be measured in low and middle frequency range, and equivalent sound pressure level (L E ) output was calculated. Results for the different conditions obtained in five heads were analyzed in subsequent frequency ranges. Comparing the difference in RW membrane velocity showed higher L E in the LC opened condition [mean: 103 equivalent dB SPL], than in LC intact or blue-lined conditions [63 and 74 equivalent dB SPL, respectively]. No difference was observed between the LC opened and the standard OW condition. Inducing stapes fixation, however, led to a difference in the low frequency range of L E compared to LC opened. In conclusion, this feasibility study showed promising results for direct acoustic stimulation at this specific anatomically and surgically more accessible inner ear site. Future studies are needed to address the impact of LC stimulation on cochlear micromechanics and on the vestibular system like dizziness and risks of hearing loss.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here