
Detection of anti-M. leprae antibodies in children in leprosy-endemic areas: A systematic review
Author(s) -
Louise Pierneef,
Anouk van Hooij,
Anneke T. Taal,
Raisa Rumbaut,
Maurício Lisboa Nobre,
Wim H. van Brakel,
Annemieke Geluk
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos neglected tropical diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.99
H-Index - 135
eISSN - 1935-2735
pISSN - 1935-2727
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009667
Subject(s) - leprosy , seroprevalence , mycobacterium leprae , serology , asymptomatic , transmission (telecommunications) , immunology , medicine , antibody , biology , virology , electrical engineering , engineering
Background Leprosy elimination primarily targets transmission of Mycobacterium leprae which is not restricted to patients’ households. As interruption of transmission is imminent in many countries, a test to detect infected asymptomatic individuals who can perpetuate transmission is required. Antibodies directed against M . leprae antigens are indicative of M . leprae infection but cannot discriminate between active and past infection. Seroprevalence in young children, however, reflects recent M . leprae infection and may thus be used to monitor transmission in an area. Therefore, this literature review aimed to evaluate what has been reported on serological tests measuring anti- M . leprae antibodies in children without leprosy below the age of 15 in leprosy-endemic areas. Methods and findings A literature search was performed in the databases Pubmed, Infolep, Web of Science and The Virtual Health Library. From the 724 articles identified through the search criteria, 28 full-text articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Two additional papers were identified through snowballing, resulting in a total of 30 articles reporting data from ten countries. All serological tests measured antibodies against phenolic glycolipid-I or synthetic derivatives thereof, either quantitatively (ELISA or UCP-LFA) or qualitatively (ML-flow or NDO-LID rapid test). The median seroprevalence in children in endemic areas was 14.9% and was stable over time if disease incidence remained unchanged. Importantly, seroprevalence decreased with age, indicating that children are a suitable group for sensitive assessment of recent M . leprae infection. However, direct comparison between areas, solely based on the data reported in these studies, was impeded by the use of different tests and variable cut-off levels. Conclusions Quantitative anti-PGL-I serology in young children holds promise as a screening test to assess M . leprae infection and may be applied as a proxy for transmission and thereby as a means to monitor the effect of (prophylactic) interventions on the route to leprosy elimination.