z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Total Survey Error and the Interpretation of Intervention Coverage Estimates from Household Surveys
Author(s) -
Thomas P. Eisele,
Dale A. Rhoda,
Felicity Cutts,
Joseph Keating,
Ruilin Ren,
Aluísio J D Barros,
Fred Arnold
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
plos medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.847
H-Index - 228
eISSN - 1549-1676
pISSN - 1549-1277
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001386
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , survey data collection , sampling (signal processing) , confidence interval , population , statistics , point estimation , intervention (counseling) , psychological intervention , small area estimation , medicine , environmental health , geography , computer science , mathematics , archaeology , filter (signal processing) , estimator , psychiatry , computer vision
In a PLOS Medicine Review, Thomas Eisele and colleagues discuss the importance of considering sampling and non-sampling errors when interpreting estimates of coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions based on data from household surveys.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here