z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Models of near-field spectroscopic studies: comparison between Finite-Element and Finite-Difference methods
Author(s) -
Thomas Grosges,
Alexandre Vial,
Dominique Barchiesi
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
optics express
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.394
H-Index - 271
ISSN - 1094-4087
DOI - 10.1364/opex.13.008483
Subject(s) - finite difference time domain method , finite element method , optics , physics , electromagnetic field , lorentz transformation , convergence (economics) , computation , dispersion (optics) , finite difference method , regular grid , field (mathematics) , grid , mathematical analysis , computational physics , geometry , mathematics , classical mechanics , algorithm , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics , economics , thermodynamics , economic growth
We compare the numerical results obtained by the Finite Element Method (FEM) and the Finite Difference Time Domain Method (FDTD) for near-field spectroscopic studies and intensity map computations. We evaluate their respective efficiencies and we show that an accurate description of the dispersion and of the geometry of the material must be included for a realistic modeling. In particular for the nano-objects, we show that a grid size around rhoa approximately 4pia/lambda (expressed in lambda units) as well as a Drude-Lorentz' model of dispersion for FDTD should be used in order to describe more accurately the confinement of the light around the nanostructures (i.e. the high gradients of the electromagnetic field) and to assure the convergence to the physical solution.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here