z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Photonic crystal light trapping for photocatalysis
Author(s) -
Xiwen Zhang,
Sajeev John
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
optics express
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.394
H-Index - 271
ISSN - 1094-4087
DOI - 10.1364/oe.427218
Subject(s) - photocatalysis , materials science , photonic crystal , visible spectrum , optoelectronics , optics , nanorod , nanotechnology , physics , chemistry , biochemistry , catalysis
The Achilles heel of wide-band photocatalysts such as TiO 2 is the insufficient photogeneration in the visible range under sunlight. This has been a longstanding impediment to large-scale, real-world deployment of titania-based photocatalysis applications. Instead of traditional band engineering through heavy-doping, we suggest enhancing photocatalytic efficiency of lightly-doped TiO 2 using photonic crystal (PC) structures. This strongly increases solar photogeneration through novel wave-interference-based light trapping. Four photocatalyst structures - simple cubic woodpile (wdp), square lattice nanorod (nrPC), slanted conical-pore (scPore), and face-centered cubic inverse opal (invop) - are optimized and compared for light harvesting in the sub- and above-gap (282 to 550 nm) regions of weakly absorbing TiO 2 , with the imaginary part of the dielectric constant 0.01 in the visible range. The optimized lattice constants for the first three, and opal center-to-center distance for invop, are ∼300 - 350 nm. For fixed PC thickness, the ranking of visible light harvesting capability is: scPore > wdp ∼ nrPC > invop. The scPore PC deposited on highly reflective substrate is ideal for photocatalysis given its combination of enhanced light trapping and superior charge transport.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here