
Comparison of full-sky polarization and radiance observations to radiative transfer simulations which employ AERONET products
Author(s) -
Nathan J. Pust,
Andrew R. Dahlberg,
Michael J. Thomas,
Joseph A. Shaw
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
optics express
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.394
H-Index - 271
ISSN - 1094-4087
DOI - 10.1364/oe.19.018602
Subject(s) - aeronet , radiance , radiative transfer , remote sensing , polarimeter , aerosol , sky , atmospheric radiative transfer codes , polarization (electrochemistry) , environmental science , angstrom exponent , optics , scattering , physics , polarimetry , meteorology , geology , chemistry
Visible-band and near infrared polarization and radiance images measured with a ground-based full-sky polarimeter are compared against a successive orders of scattering (SOS) radiative transfer model for 2009 summer cloud-free days in Bozeman, Montana, USA. The polarimeter measures radiance and polarization in 10-nm bands centered at 450 nm, 490 nm, 530 nm, 630 nm, and 700 nm. AERONET products are used to represent aerosols in the SOS model, while MISR satellite BRF products are used for the surface reflectance. While model results generally agree well with observation, the simulated degree of polarization is typically higher than observed data. Potential sources of this difference may include cloud contamination and/or underestimation of the AERONET-retrieved aerosol real refractive index. Problems with the retrieved parameters are not unexpected given the low aerosol optical depth range (0.025 to 0.17 at 500 nm) during the study and the corresponding difficulties that these conditions pose to the AERONET inversion algorithm.