z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Imaging effectiveness calculator for non-design microscope samples
Author(s) -
Stephen M. Anthony,
Philip R. Miller,
Jerilyn A. Timlin,
Ronen Polsky
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
applied optics
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.668
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 2155-3165
pISSN - 1559-128X
DOI - 10.1364/ao.58.006027
Subject(s) - strehl ratio , microfabrication , optics , microscope , materials science , microfluidics , image quality , refractive index , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , fabrication , microscopy , computer science , nanotechnology , optoelectronics , adaptive optics , physics , artificial intelligence , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , image (mathematics)
When attempting to integrate single-molecule fluorescence microscopy with microfabricated devices such as microfluidic channels, fabrication constraints may prevent using traditional coverslips. Instead, the fabricated devices may require imaging through material with a different thickness or index of refraction. Altering either can easily reduce the quality of the image formation (measured by the Strehl ratio) by a factor of 2 or more, reducing the signal-to-noise ratio accordingly. In such cases, successful detection of single-molecule fluorescence may prove difficult or impossible. Here we provide software to calculate the effect of non-design materials upon the Strehl ratio or ensquared energy and explore the impact of common materials used in microfabrication.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here