Premium
“Am I Going to Be in Trouble for What I'm Doing?”: Providing Contraceptive Care in Religious Health Care Systems
Author(s) -
Liu Yuan,
Hebert Luciana E.,
Hasselbacher Lee A.,
Stulberg Debra B.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
perspectives on sexual and reproductive health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.818
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1931-2393
pISSN - 1538-6341
DOI - 10.1363/psrh.12125
Subject(s) - health care , context (archaeology) , lease , medicine , thematic analysis , nursing , protestantism , family medicine , public relations , psychology , qualitative research , sociology , political science , law , paleontology , social science , biology
CONTEXT Catholic systems control a growing share of health care in the United States. Because patients seeking contraceptives in Catholic facilities face doctrinal restrictions that may affect access to and quality of care, it is important to understand whether and how providers work within and around institutional policies regarding contraception. METHODS In 2016–2018, in‐depth interviews were conducted in Illinois with 28 key informants—including providers (obstetrician‐gynecologists, other physicians, nurse‐midwives) and nonclinical professionals (ethicists, administrators, chaplains)—who had experience in secular, Protestant or Catholic health care systems. Interviews addressed multiple aspects of reproductive care and hospital and system policy. A thematic content approach was used to identify themes related to participants' experiences with and perspectives on contraceptive care. RESULTS While respondents working in secular and Protestant systems reported few limitations on contraceptive care, those working in Catholic systems reported multiple barriers. Providers who had worked in Catholic systems described variable institutional policies and enforcement practices, ranging from verbal admonishments to lease agreements prohibiting contraceptive provision in secular clinics on church‐owned land. Despite these restrictions, patients' needs motivated many providers to utilize work‐arounds; some providers reported having been pressured or directly instructed to document false diagnoses in patients' medical records. Interviewees described how these obstacles burdened patients, especially those with social and financial constraints, and resulted in delayed or lower quality care. CONCLUSIONS Providers working in Catholic hospitals are limited in their ability to serve women of reproductive age. Work‐arounds intended to circumvent restrictions may inadvertently stigmatize contraception and negatively affect patient care.