Premium
Adolescents’ Contraceptive Use with School‐Discordant Partners: Exploring Individual‐ and Relationship‐Level Characteristics
Author(s) -
Strully Kate,
Kennedy David
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
perspectives on sexual and reproductive health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.818
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1931-2393
pISSN - 1538-6341
DOI - 10.1363/psrh.12117
Subject(s) - condom , psychology , psychosocial , context (archaeology) , longitudinal study , developmental psychology , odds , demography , population , adolescent health , family planning , medicine , clinical psychology , logistic regression , family medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , psychiatry , research methodology , environmental health , paleontology , nursing , syphilis , pathology , sociology , biology
CONTEXT Heterosexual adolescents are less likely to use contraceptives when their partners are of different backgrounds or social circles. It is unclear why risky behaviors are more common within these relationships, and characteristics associated with school‐discordant partners—that is, partners who do not attend the adolescent's school—are particularly understudied. METHODS Characteristics of romantic relationships and contraceptive use were examined among 1,043 female and 961 male respondents in Waves 1 (1994–1995) and 2 (1996) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Generalized linear regression and structural equation models identified individual‐ and relationship‐level characteristics that were associated with school‐discordant relationships and contraceptive use. RESULTS For females, the likelihood of ever having used a condom with a partner was reduced when that partner had not attended her school at the start of the relationship (odds ratio, 0.5) or when he was two or more years older (0.6). Notably, however, having a school‐ or age‐discordant partner was not associated with ever having used hormonal or dual methods for females, or with any contraceptive measures for males. For females, lower emotional intimacy with school‐discordant partners was positively associated with ever having used condoms with such partners (1.2). CONCLUSIONS Characteristics of school‐discordant relationships are correlated with condom use in varying and sometimes countervailing ways. Future research examining the mechanisms linking school discordance to decreased condom use, particularly for females, would deepen understanding of the emotional and psychosocial processes involved in adolescents’ sexual and contraceptive behavior.