Premium
Abortion Stigma Among Low‐Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment
Author(s) -
Gelman Amanda,
Rosenfeld Elian A.,
Nikolajski Cara,
Freedman Lori R.,
Steinberg Julia R.,
Borrero Sonya
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
perspectives on sexual and reproductive health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.818
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1931-2393
pISSN - 1538-6341
DOI - 10.1363/psrh.12014
Subject(s) - abortion , qualitative research , medicine , stigma (botany) , fertility , psychological intervention , family planning , pregnancy , distress , reproductive health , context (archaeology) , unsafe abortion , family medicine , gynecology , population , psychology , psychiatry , clinical psychology , environmental health , research methodology , sociology , social science , paleontology , genetics , biology
CONTEXT Abortion stigma may cause psychological distress in women who are considering having an abortion or have had one. This phenomenon has been relatively underexplored in low‐income women, who may already be at an increased risk for poor abortion‐related outcomes because of difficulties accessing timely and safe abortion services. METHODS A qualitative study conducted between 2010 and 2013 used semistructured interviews to explore pregnancy intentions among low‐income women recruited from six reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania. Transcripts from interviews with 19 participants who were planning to terminate a pregnancy or had had an abortion in the last two weeks were examined through content analysis to identify the range of attitudes they encountered that could contribute to or reflect abortion stigma, the sources of these attitudes and women's responses to them. RESULTS Women commonly reported that partners, family members and they themselves held antiabortion attitudes. Such attitudes communicated that abortion is morally reprehensible, a rejection of motherhood, rare and thus potentially deviant, detrimental to future fertility and an irresponsible choice. Women reacted to external and internal negative attitudes by distinguishing themselves from other women who obtain abortions, experiencing negative emotions, and concealing or delaying their abortions. CONCLUSIONS Women's reactions to antiabortion attitudes may perpetuate abortion stigma. Further research is needed to inform interventions to address abortion stigma and improve women's abortion experiences.