Institutional Selectivity and Good Practices in Undergraduate Education: How Strong is the Link?
Author(s) -
Ernest T. Pascarella,
Ty M. Cruce,
Paul D. Umbach,
Gregory C. Wolniak,
George D. Kuh,
Robert M. Carini,
John C. Hayek,
Robert M. Gonyea,
Chun-Mei Zhao
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
the journal of higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.168
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1538-4640
pISSN - 0022-1546
DOI - 10.1353/jhe.2006.0016
Subject(s) - excellence , proxy (statistics) , higher education , variance (accounting) , psychology , institution , mathematics education , medical education , political science , statistics , sociology , mathematics , accounting , economics , medicine , social science , law
Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the public's understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institution's median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barron's Selectivity Score explained from less than 0.1% to 20% of the between-institution variance and from less than 0.1% to 2.7% of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom