Splitting the Difference: Aesthetic Relations in Henry James and Leo Bersani
Author(s) -
Sigi Jöttkandt
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the henry james review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.195
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1080-6555
pISSN - 0273-0340
DOI - 10.1353/hjr.2011.0017
Subject(s) - subjectivity , object (grammar) , realism , subject (documents) , relation (database) , period (music) , philosophy , aesthetics , art , literature , psychoanalysis , epistemology , psychology , computer science , linguistics , database , library science
As an alternative to psychoanalysis’s aggressive subject/object relation, Leo Bersani proposes a more modulated, aesthetic subjectivity. This essay explores Bersani’s concept of aesthetic relations through impressionism’s and realism’s competing demands on the artistic object in Henry James’s “Flickerbridge.” I suggest this 1902 short story can be productively read as a theory of the perspectival shift James was exploring in his experiments with literary impressionism in that period
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom