Premium
Creating Fido's Twin Can Pet Cloning Be Ethically Justified?
Author(s) -
FIESTER AUTUMN
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
hastings center report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.515
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1552-146X
pISSN - 0093-0334
DOI - 10.1353/hcr.2005.0037
Subject(s) - cloning (programming) , animal welfare , grief , face (sociological concept) , value (mathematics) , pet therapy , psychology , law and economics , internet privacy , computer science , sociology , biology , psychotherapist , programming language , ecology , social science , machine learning
Taken at face value, pet cloning may seem at best a frivolous practice, costly both to the cloned pet's health and its owner's pocket. At worst, its critics say, it is misguided and unhealthy—a way of exploiting grief to the detriment of the animal, its owner, and perhaps even animal welfare in general. But if the great pains we are willing to take to clone Fido raise the status of companion animals in the public eye, then the practice might be defensible.