Premium
The continuing potential relevance of equivalence and allegiance to research on psychological treatment of psychosis
Author(s) -
Shapiro David A.,
Paley Graham
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
psychology and psychotherapy: theory, research and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.102
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 2044-8341
pISSN - 1476-0835
DOI - 10.1348/147608302321151880
Subject(s) - allegiance , relevance (law) , psychology , psychosis , salience (neuroscience) , preparedness , equivalence (formal languages) , psychotherapist , psychiatry , cognitive psychology , philosophy , political science , linguistics , politics , law
In response to Tarrier and colleagues' critique of our recent paper (Paley & Shapiro, 2002), we note that the equivalent outcomes paradox and investigator allegiance problem remain of considerable potential relevance to research on psychological treatment of psychosis. We note in particular their salience to recent work reported by Tarrier and his colleagues. We also comment that our preparedness to entertain the contributions of diverse treatment models does not entail a theoretical approach.