Premium
When explanations for layoffs are not enough: Employer's integrity as a moderator of the relationship between informational justice and retaliation
Author(s) -
Skarlicki Daniel P.,
Barclay Laurie J.,
Pugh Douglas S.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of occupational and organizational psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.257
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 2044-8325
pISSN - 0963-1798
DOI - 10.1348/096317907x206848
Subject(s) - layoff , economic justice , moderation , social psychology , psychology , perception , interactional justice , sincerity , organizational justice , political science , economics , organizational commitment , unemployment , neuroscience , law , economic growth
Victims of downsizing often perceive their layoff as being unfair, which can lead to various forms of retaliation. Informational justice, defined as providing employees with adequate explanations in a timely manner, has been prescribed as a way to mitigate the retaliation tendencies associated with unfairness perceptions. Few studies, however, have examined contexts in which informational justice might be more vs. less effective in this regard. In the present research, we explored whether employees' perception of the employer's integrity moderates the relationship between informational justice and retaliation among layoff victims. Results from a field and laboratory study suggest that informational justice helps manage retaliation only when layoff victims perceived that their employer had high (vs. low) integrity prior to the layoff. In Study 2, we found that perceived sincerity mediated the impact of informational justice by integrity interaction on retaliation.