Premium
A comparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment: General victimization and bully/victim problems among German schoolchildren
Author(s) -
Schäfer Mechthild,
Werner Nicole E.,
Crick Nicki R.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
british journal of developmental psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.062
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 2044-835X
pISSN - 0261-510X
DOI - 10.1348/026151002166451
Subject(s) - psychology , peer victimization , german , construct (python library) , developmental psychology , context (archaeology) , human factors and ergonomics , poison control , peer group , social psychology , medicine , paleontology , environmental health , archaeology , biology , computer science , history , programming language
Studies of children who are the frequent targets of peers' aggressive acts have been guided by two differing research traditions, namely the ‘bully/victim’ and the ‘general victimization’ traditions. Although the terms ‘bullying’ and ‘victimization’ are often used interchangeably, these constructs represent approaches that differ in terms of conceptual definitions of negative peer treatment, research methodologies, and relative interest in group‐versus individual‐level phenomena. The present study was designed as a first step towards the integration of these diverse literatures. Our specific goals were: to validate the relational victimization construct with a German sample of early adolescents ( N = 217) through replication of previously published findings, and to examine systematically the relations among constructs derived from the two approaches. Our results showed that relational victimization, physical victimization, and bully/victim experiences were moderately correlated. The non‐overlapping properties of the constructs, however, are best understood in the context of gender differences.