Premium
National symbols and distinctiveness: Rhetorical strategies in creating distinct national identities
Author(s) -
Finell Eerika,
Liebkind Karmela
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
british journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 2044-8309
pISSN - 0144-6665
DOI - 10.1348/014466609x455190
Subject(s) - optimal distinctiveness theory , ideology , rhetorical question , social psychology , national identity , psychology , meaning (existential) , universalism , nationalism , representativeness heuristic , collective identity , sociology , linguistics , political science , law , philosophy , politics , psychotherapist
The purpose of this study is to examine qualitatively how respondents create national distinctiveness using rhetorical identity strategies in the context of four Finnish national symbols. The data consist of 127 essays written by Finnish secondary school students. Analysis revealed five different strategies used to distinguish between the in‐group and the out‐group. These strategies differ on two dimensions: the level of polarization, and the extent to which the in‐group–out‐group relationship is depicted as being active versus passive. Furthermore, the analysis showed that the two dimensions of nationalism, particularism and universalism, have an important role in the differentiation processes and therefore highlighted the importance of taking into consideration ideological issues while studying social identities. The meaning of the contents of national identity in the differentiation processes is also discussed.