Premium
Exploring the effects of age and delay on children's person identifications: Verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards
Author(s) -
Karageorge Aspasia,
Zajac Rachel
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
british journal of psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.536
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 2044-8295
pISSN - 0007-1269
DOI - 10.1348/000712610x507902
Subject(s) - psychology , suspect , eyewitness identification , developmental psychology , identification (biology) , cognitive psychology , audiology , medicine , criminology , database , relation (database) , computer science , botany , biology
We explored the effects of age and retention interval on several measures of children's person identification ability: verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the success of a ‘wildcard’– a photo of a silhouetted figure with a large question mark superimposed – in reducing children's tendency to choose from target‐absent lineups. Children aged 5–7 years ( N = 101) and 8–11 years ( N = 109) were briefly exposed to an experimental confederate during a staged event. Either 1–2 days or 2 weeks later, children described the confederate and were then presented with either a target‐present or ‐absent lineup. Within each group, approximately half of the children were presented with a wildcard and half were not. Target‐present lineup performance improved as age increased. Compared to control children, children in the wildcard condition were more likely to correctly reject the target‐absent lineup, and less likely to identify the innocent suspect. The wildcard did not influence children's target‐present lineup accuracy, nor did delay exert an influence on any of our measures of lineup performance. These findings extend our knowledge of children's person identifications, as well as providing further support for the use of wildcards in photographic lineups.