Premium
Understanding words, understanding numbers: An exploration of the mathematical profiles of poor comprehenders
Author(s) -
Pimperton Hannah.,
Nation Kate.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
british journal of educational psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.557
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 2044-8279
pISSN - 0007-0998
DOI - 10.1348/000709909x477251
Subject(s) - psychology , comprehension , reading comprehension , cognitive psychology , developmental psychology , reading (process) , task (project management) , verbal reasoning , sample (material) , cognition , linguistics , philosophy , management , neuroscience , economics , chemistry , chromatography
Background Poor comprehenders are children who show significant deficits in their reading comprehension performance, despite average, or above‐average word reading ability. To date, there have been no in‐depth studies of the mathematical performance profiles of such children. Aims This study aimed to explore the mathematical profiles of poor comprehenders. Given that language impairment is associated with difficulties with mathematics, and that poor comprehenders tend to have oral language weaknesses, we hypothesized that poor comprehenders would show relative weaknesses in aspects of mathematical performance. Sample From a sample of 109 children aged 7–8 years, we selected 14 poor comprehenders and 14 controls with age‐appropriate reading comprehension ability. The groups were matched on non‐verbal ability, multiple measures of reading accuracy, and chronological age. Methods We compared the performance of the group of poor comprehenders with that of the matched controls on two standardized measures of mathematical ability, one measuring procedural arithmetic prowess and the other tapping higher‐level mathematical reasoning. Results Although there were no group differences in performance on the arithmetic measure, the poor comprehenders showed significantly lower scores than the controls on the mathematical reasoning task. The poor comprehenders exhibited impaired verbal ability relative to controls, with these differences in verbal ability associated with the group differences found on the test of mathematical reasoning. Conclusions Poor comprehenders' deficits are not limited to the domain of literacy; their underlying profile of impairments also seems to selectively impact on certain components of mathematical ability.