z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies
Author(s) -
Xiaohua Jiang,
HB Meng,
D. L. Zhou,
W. X. Ding,
Lu Ls
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
annals of the royal college of surgeons of england
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.39
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1478-7083
pISSN - 0035-8843
DOI - 10.1308/003588413x13629960049397
Subject(s) - medicine , acute appendicitis , port (circuit theory) , surgery , blood loss , demographics , laparoscopy , appendicitis , general surgery , demography , electrical engineering , sociology , engineering
Appendicectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in general surgery. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of open appendicectomy (OA), laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and single port laparoscopic appendicectomy (SPLA). Methods Fifty consecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis were studied (OA: n=20, LA: n=20, SPLA: n=10). Clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and cost. Results Patient demographics were similar among groups (p>0.05). SPLA was characterised by longer operative time (88.1 minutes vs 35.6 minutes in OA and 33.4 minutes in LA) and higher costs (12.84 thousand Chinese yuan [RMB] vs 8.41 thousand RMB in LA and 4.99 thousand RMB in OA). OA was characterised by more blood loss (9.8ml vs 7.5ml in SPLA and 6.8ml in LA), longer hospital stay (7.5 days vs 3.5 days in LA and 3.4 days in SPLA) and lower costs. The total number of complications was higher for OA (n=2) than for LA and SPLA (n=0) although this was not statistically significant. Conclusions Where feasible, LA should be undertaken as the initial treatment of choice for most cases of suspected appendicitis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here