z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prediction of Area and Production of Groundnut Using Box-Jenkins Arima and Neural Network Approach
Author(s) -
Pavan Kumar,
Ferdinand B. Lyngdoh
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of reliability and statistical studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2229-5666
pISSN - 0974-8024
DOI - 10.13052/jrss0974-8024.13244
Subject(s) - autoregressive integrated moving average , box–jenkins , artificial neural network , mean squared error , statistics , mathematics , residual , production (economics) , data set , model selection , set (abstract data type) , moving average , computer science , time series , artificial intelligence , algorithm , economics , macroeconomics , programming language
Selection of parameters for Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model in the prediction process is one of the most important tasks. In the present study, groundnut data was utlised to decide appropriate p, d, q parameters for ARIMA model for the prediction purpose. Firstly, the models were fit to data without splitting into training and validation/testing sets and evaluated for their efficiency in predicting the area and production of groundnut over the years. Meanwhile, models are compared among other fitted ARIMA models with different p, d, q parameters based on decision criteria’s viz., ME, RMSE, MAPE, AIC, BIC and R-Square. The ARIMA model with parameters p-2 d-1-2, q-1-2 are found adequate in predicting the area as well as production of groundnut. The model ARIMA (2, 2, 2) and ARIMA (2,1,1) predicted the area of groundnut crop with minimum error estimates and residual characteristics (ei). The models were fit into split data i.e., training and test data set, but these models’ prediction power (R-Square) declined during testing. In case of predicting the area, ARIMA (2,2,2) was consistent over the split data but it was not consistent while predicting the production over years. Feed-forward neural networks with single hidden layer were fit to complete, training and split data. The neural network models provided better estimates compared to Box-Jenkins ARIMA models. The data was analysed using R-Studio.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here