
A MULTI-CRITERIA JOB EVALUATION METHOD FOR A STATE BANK
Author(s) -
Ezgi Demirtaş,
Yeliz Buruk,
Müjgan Sa r
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of the analytic hierarchy process
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.213
H-Index - 3
ISSN - 1936-6744
DOI - 10.13033/ijahp.v7i2.264
Subject(s) - competence (human resources) , wage , consistency (knowledge bases) , task (project management) , job evaluation , productivity , business , computer science , job analysis , operations management , labour economics , economics , job satisfaction , management , artificial intelligence , macroeconomics
Wage management is an important task which affects a firm’s productivity in the short term and the consistency of the firm’s activities in long term. If an organization fails to establish a fair wage policy among the personnel, conflict is inevitable in the organization. A fair wage policy can be achieved by job evaluation, which is a technique used to determine the relative importance of all jobs in an organization. Jobs are evaluated with respect to ability, responsibility, effort, and job condition factors etc. which make it a multi-criteria problem for organizations. In this study, a job evaluation methodology is developed for a state bank in Turkey. The relative importance of the evaluation criteria which is then used to grade jobs with respect to one another by a Liberatore scale is determined by an Analytic Network Process (ANP) model. This new methodology has a positive effect on competence and performance management systems.