Open AccessNo difference in long-term micromotion between fully cemented and hybrid fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
Author(s) -
Kelly Mills,
A. B. Wymenga,
Gijs G. van Hellemondt,
Petra J C Heesterbeek
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
the bone and joint journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.587
H-Index - 181
eISSN - 2049-4408
pISSN - 2049-4394
DOI - 10.1302/0301-620x.104b7.bjj-2021-1600.r1
Subject(s) - medicine , interquartile range , osteoarthritis , surgery , randomized controlled trial , arthroplasty , oxford knee score , fixation (population genetics) , total knee arthroplasty , range of motion , knee joint , orthodontics , population , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology
Both the femoral and tibial component are usually cemented at revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), while stems can be added with either cemented or press-fit (hybrid) fixation. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term stability of rTKA with cemented and press-fitted stems, using radiostereometric analysis (RSA).